• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Hip and Knee News

News Resource About Hip, Knee and Orthopedic Surgery

  • Home
  • Hip Surgery
  • Knee Surgery
  • Resources
    • Hip and Knee Glossary
  • About/Contact

Blog

Spinal anesthesia tied to increased opioid use after hip surgery

by

[ad_1]

Spinal anesthesia is increasingly being used instead of general anesthesia to improve patient comfort and reduce opioid use, but it could be having the opposite effect on hip fracture patients, according to research published June 13 in Annals of Internal Medicine.

“In our study, patients who got spinal anesthesia did get fewer opioids in the operating room, but they ended up having more pain, and more prescription pain medication use after surgery,” said lead author Mark Neuman, MD, anesthesiologist and past-chair of the Penn Medicine Opioid Task Force, said. “While our study can’t determine conclusively whether this was due to the spinal anesthesia itself or the fact that fewer opioids were given up front, this is a result that should make people examine some of the assumptions informing current care pathways.”

To confirm whether assumptions about spinal anesthesia and reduced pain were accurate, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia examined 1,600 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2016 and 2021. About half of enrollees had spinal anesthesia and the other half had general anesthesia, with each patient asked to assess their pain levels at varying intervals and outline their prescription painkiller use after surgery.

Overall, patients rated their worst pain the day after surgery. Spinal anesthesia patients indicated slightly higher levels of their worst pain, averaging 7.9 out of 10 compared to 7.6 among those who had general anesthesia, according to the study.

Spinal anesthesia patients were 33 percent more likely than general anesthesia patients to have taken prescription painkillers about two months after surgery, according to the study. No significant difference in prescription painkiller use was noted at six and 12 months after surgery, but researchers said the results are still reason to be wary.

“Even though the 180- and 365-day findings are not statistically significant, the 60-day finding is still concerning, since there could be medication-related harms like respiratory depression or over-sedation that could still occur over the short term,” Dr. Neuman said.

Researchers aim to conduct another study comparing the effects of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia on total hip replacements.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: HIP, hip surgery, ORTHO NEWS

Prior Diagnosis of COVID Has No Increased Complications in Total Joint Arthroplasty

by

Introduction

Although a substantial portion of the United States population has been infected with and recovered from Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19), many patients may have persistent symptoms and complications from disease-driven respiratory disease, arrhythmias, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). With institutions resuming elective total joint arthroplasties (TJA), it is unclear whether a prior resolved diagnosis of COVID has any implications on postoperative outcomes.

Methods

All elective TJA performed in 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed and a history of prior COVID+ result recorded. Baseline demographics, days from prior COVID+ result to surgery date, preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization, and laboratory markers were obtained to determine baseline characteristics. Postoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), rate of revision surgery, and discharge destination were compared between groups. Perioperative and postoperative rates of VTE, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, postoperative oxygen supplementation, cardiac arrhythmia, renal disease, sepsis, and periprosthetic joint infections within six months of surgery were recorded.

Results

Of the 155 elective TJA performed in 2021, 24 patients had a prior COVID+ diagnosis with a mean of 253 days from positive result to surgery date. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative lab markers between groups. Surgeries on patients with a prior COVID+ had a significantly higher EBL (260 vs 175cc), but postoperative outcomes of VTE, UTI, pneumonia, oxygen supplementation requirement, nares MRSA+, cardiac disease, and infection rates between groups were similar. Bivariate logistic regression revealed increased days from COVID+ diagnosis (>6 months) to surgery date were associated with a shorter LOS.

Conclusion

Although a prior COVID+ diagnosis had increased intraoperative blood loss, there were no significant differences in respiratory, infectious, cardiac, and thromboembolic complications up to six months after elective TJA. This study suggests that asymptomatic C+ patients receiving elective TJA do not require more aggressive prophylactic anticoagulation or antibiotic regimens to prevent VTE or perioperative infections. As institutions around the nation resume pre-COVID rates of arthroplasty surgeries, a prior diagnosis of COVID appears to have no effects on postoperative complications.

Introduction

Due to the COVID-19 nonessential procedure restriction, there was a large decrease in orthopedic procedures during the pandemic. One study estimated that approximately 30,000 primary and 3000 revision hip and knee arthroplasty procedures were canceled each week throughout the COVID-19 nonessential procedure restrictions [1]. As cases resumed, multiple studies have explored the short-term effects of COVID-19 on the perioperative morbidity and mortality of various orthopedic surgeries. A 2020 study by Kayani et al. demonstrated an increased length of hospital stay, more critical care admissions, higher risk of perioperative complications, and increased mortality in COVID-19-positive (C+) patients undergoing hip fracture surgery compared to COVID-19-negative (C-) patients [2]. These results were consistent with other orthopedic surgical outcomes of femur neck and ankle fracture surgeries [3,4].

Several notable complications that were tightly bound to the COVID-19 virus were the increased risk of venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, as well as respiratory issues inherent to the virus. As recently assessed by Forlenza et al., the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), owing to the hypercoagulability associated with the inflammatory state [5]. Additionally, the study determined a temporal relationship between COVID-19 diagnosis and TJA, with an increased risk of DVT and PE in patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 one month prior to their operation versus two or three months. This temporalizing trend was also witnessed when assessing the post-operative risk for pneumonia between C+ and C- patients [6,7]. Likewise, a study exploring the complication rates in C+ patients after hip fracture repair demonstrated an increased risk of post-operative atrial fibrillation compared to C- patients [7].

Notably, a rare yet significant complication of joint replacement is the risk of infection of the prosthesis which is a common cause of joint replacement revision. While minimal data has been presented regarding the risk of prosthetic joint infection, previous studies have demonstrated no significant risk of infection in TJA [6,8]. Additionally, the imposed restriction during the COVID-19 pandemic significantly hindered the ability of patients to seek adequate and continuous rehabilitation post-operatively which led to overall worse patient-reported outcomes [9]. Lastly, while the length of hospital stay (LOS) for surgical orthopedic patients has decreased in hopes of limiting the risk of COVID-19 infection, there was a significant increase in LOS in a previous study in C+ hip fracture patients compared to C- patients secondary to increased risk for complications as well as slower rehabilitation and dependence on oxygen supplementation.

While the short-term effects of a recent COVID-19 diagnosis on post-operative outcome have been explored, the effects of a previous C+ diagnosis and recovery on the outcomes of an orthopedic procedure and, more specifically, total joint arthroplasties, remains unclear. As the COVID-19 virus becomes increasingly more ubiquitous, it is important to gain an understanding regarding the complications or lack thereof that previously infected patients may face in future TJA procedures. For this reason, the objective of this study is to establish the complication risks of previous COVID-19-positivity on the postoperative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty.

This study aims to identify any significant differences in prosthetic joint infections, DVT and PE incidence, post-operative oxygen requirement, estimated blood loss (EBL), and LOS between prior asymptomatic C+ and C- patients undergoing TJA.

Materials & Methods

All elective TJA performed in 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed and a history of prior PCR C+ result recorded. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of California, Irvine Institutional Review Board. Baseline demographics, days from prior C+ result to the surgery date, preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization, and preoperative laboratory markers were obtained to determine baseline characteristics between groups.

All patients received standardized preoperative optimization including weight control and medical co-management when indicated. Within 72 hours prior to surgery, all asymptomatic patients received a COVID test to ensure no active infection or spread of infection through asymptomatic carriers. Patients with C+ results were rescheduled at least four weeks after the last C+ test and retested to ensure negative COVID test 72 hours prior to new surgical date. On the date of surgery, all patients were tested for MRSA Nares in the preoperative area. Patients were then prepped and draped in a standardized fashion including preoperative shaving with electrical clippers as needed and scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate for skin antisepsis. Preoperative prophylaxis included weight-based antibiotic dosing of Ancef, or Vancomycin and Gentamycin for those with penicillin allergies, or for those with a positive MRSA colonization. Of note, the approaches used for the hip procedure were entirely anterior approaches while the approach for knee arthroplasty was the medial parapatellar approach. Postoperatively, patients received two doses of cefazolin 2 grams for 24 hours per standard protocol. Post-surgical venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis consisted of aspirin 81 mg twice daily for six weeks with the addition of Sequential Compression Devices (SCDs) or compression stockings for patients without any prior history of a DVT. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation were resumed on their home oral anticoagulant (Apixaban or Rivaroxaban) on postoperative day 1 without aspirin. Patients who were unable to take home oral anticoagulant or aspirin were given daily Lovenox 40 mg injections for six weeks for VTE chemoprophylaxis.

Postoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), rate of revision surgery, and discharge destination were compared between groups. Perioperative and postoperative rates of VTE, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, postoperative oxygen supplementation, new cardiac arrhythmia, renal disease, sepsis, and periprosthetic joint infections within six months of surgery were recorded. Patients who required any supplemental oxygenation, including nasal cannula or oxygen mask, and patients who required blood transfusion(s) were recorded. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was determined using the updated 2018 criteria for periprosthetic infections including the presence of a sinus tract or two positive cultures with the same pathogen comprising the major criteria, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), synovial WBC, Leukocyte esterase, alpha-defensin, synovial polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN), synovial CRP comprising minor criteria [10].

Analysis was performed using the SPSS Statistical Tool. Chi-squared tests were used to determine the relationship between prior COVID+ results with postoperative EBL, LOS, rate of revision surgery, discharge destination, rates of VTE, UTI, pneumonia, postoperative oxygen supplementation, cardiac arrhythmia, renal disease, sepsis, and periprosthetic joint infections within six months of surgery. Bivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for baseline demographics was used to determine the relationship between COVID+ diagnosis and association with postoperative complications. Additionally, days from prior C+ diagnosis to surgical date were compared between groups for effects on increased EBL and LOS. Multivariate linear regression was performed to identify COVID positivity as an independent risk factor for postoperative outcomes.

Results

Of the 155 elective TJA performed in 2021, 24 patients had a prior C+ diagnosis with a mean of 253 days from positive result to surgery date. Of note, the 155 TJA consisted of 93 (60%) knee and 62 (40%) hip arthroplasty. There were no significant differences in comorbidities, BMI, type of postoperative chemical VTE prophylaxis, and WBC/INR preoperative lab markers between groups (Table 1). Although C+ patients had a significantly higher preoperative Hb level, C+ patients were more likely to be males. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to performing surgeon, type of arthroplasty (hip or knee), ASA classification, and smoking status between the two groups.

Demographic Variable +COVID-19 (n = 24) -COVID-19 (n = 131) p
Age, mean ± SD 66.8 ± 9.5 68.0 ± 10.6 0.593
Sex <0.001
                  Male, n (%) 18 (75.0) 46 (35.1)
                  Female, n (%) 6 (25.0) 85 (64.9)
BMI, mean ± SD 31.9 ± 5.3 30.4 ± 7.0 0.315
Days From COVID-19+ To Surgery, mean ± SD 253.5 ± 189.3 — —
Diabetes, n (%) 9 (37.5) 40 (30.5) 0.485
Postoperative Blood Thinner 0.490
                   ASA, n (%) 21 (87.5) 110 (84.6)
                   Lovenox, n (%) 0 (0) 7 (5.4)
                  Xarelto/Eliquis, n (%) 3 (12.5) 10 (7.7)
                  Multiple, n (%) 0 (0) 3 (2.3)
Preoperative Nares MRSA+, n (%) 2 (8.3) 2 (1.5) 0.114
Preoperative Laboratory Values
                  WBC, mean ± SD 6.4 ± 1.8 7.3 ± 2.4 0.076
                  INR, mean ± SD 1.0 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.3 0.265
                  Hb, mean ± SD 14.0 ± 1.5 12.8 ± 2.1 0.006
Table
1: Demographics

BMI, body mass index; ASA, aspirin; MRSA, methicillin-resistance staphylococcus aureus; WBC, white blood cell; INR, international normalized ratio; Hb, hemoglobin

Surgeries on patients with a prior COVID+ had a significantly higher EBL (260 vs 175cc), but postoperative outcomes of VTE, UTI, pneumonia, oxygen supplementation requirement, nares MRSA+, cardiac disease, and infection rates between groups were similar (Tables 2, 3). Of note, no patients within the study required a blood transfusion. Bivariate logistic regression revealed increased days from COVID+ diagnosis (>6 months) to surgery date was associated with a shorter LOS (Table 4). Last, multivariate analysis (Table 5) demonstrated that prior COVID+ diagnosis was associated with greater EBL, and a COVID+ diagnosis cutoff of one year ago was also associated with significantly shorter LOS.

Postoperative Complication +COVID-19 (n = 24) -COVID-19 (n = 131) p
EBL (mL), mean ± SD 258.3 ± 124.8 175.4 ± 177.9 0.030
PE, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (0.8) 1.000
UTI, n (%) 0 (0) 5 (3.8) 1.000
Postoperative Bleeding or Hematoma, n (%) 0 (0) 5 (3.8) 1.000
Pneumonia, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (0.8) 1.000
Postoperative Nasal Cannula/Oxygen Requirement in Hospital, n (%) 4 (16.7) 7 (5.3) 0.069
Renal Failure, n (%) 0 (0) 3 (2.3) 1.000
Sepsis, n (%) 0 (0) 1 (0.8) 1.000
Cardiac Arrhythmia, n (%) 0 (0) 6 (4.6) 0.591
Periprosthetic Joint Infection, n (%) 0 (0) 4 (3.1) 1.000
Revision Joint Surgery, n (%) 1 (4.2) 3 (2.3) 0.493
Revision for Infection, n (%) 1 (4.2) 3 (2.3) 0.493
Length of Stay, mean ± SD 2.6 ± 1.2 2.5 ± 1.6 0.802
Discharge Destination 0.206
Home, n (%) 18 (75.0) 114 (87.0)
Rehabilitation, n (%) 6 (25.0) 17 (13.0)
Table
2: Postoperative Complications

EBL, estimated blood loss; PE, pulmonary embolism; UTI, urinary tract infection.

Postoperative Complication OR 95% CI p
PE 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) 0.998
UTI 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) 0.998
Postoperative Bleeding/Hematoma 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) 0.998
Pneumonia 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) 0.998
Postoperative Nasal Cannula/Oxygen Requirement in Hospital 3.543 (0.950, 13.211) 0.060
Renal Failure 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) 0.998
Sepsis 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) 0.998
Cardiac Arrhythmia 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) 0.998
Periprosthetic Joint Infection 0.000 (0.000, 0.000) 0.998
Revision Joint Surgery 1.855 (0.185, 18.620) 0.599
Revision for Infection 1.855 (0.185, 18.620) 0.599
Discharge to Rehabilitation 2.235 (0.778, 6.421) 0.135
Table
3: Bivariate Logistic Regression for COVID-19 Positivity and Postoperative Complications

PE, pulmonary embolism; UTI, urinary tract infection.

Postoperative Complication USC B 95% CI p
EBL
                COVID-19+ 82.913 (7.908, 157.919) 0.030
                Days From COVID-19+ To Surgery -0.170 (-0.451, 0.112) 0.225
                COVID-19+ Cutoff 3 Months -14.737 (-147.610, 118.136) 0.820
                COVID-19+ Cutoff 6 Months -28.571 (-137.427, 80.284) 0.592
                COVID-19+ Cutoff 1 Year -87.500 (-195.381, 20.381) 0.107
Length of Stay
                COVID-19+ 0.087 (-0.597, 0.772) 0.802
                Days From COVID-19+ To Surgery -0.003 (-0.006, -0.001) 0.006
                COVID-19+ Cutoff 3 Months -1.032 (-2.241, 0.178) 0.091
                COVID-19+ Cutoff 6 Months -1.229 (-2.144, -0.313) 0.011
                COVID-19+ Cutoff 1 Year -1.437 (-2.352, -0.523) 0.004
Table
4: Bivariate Linear Regression for COVID-19 Positivity and Postoperative Complications

Having a history of COVID positivity was associated with significantly greater EBL. As the number of days from COVID-19+ increases, the hospital length of stay decreases. If COVID-19 positivity >6 months or >1 year away from a current hospital stay, LOS significantly decreased.

EBL, estimated blood loss; USC B, unstandardized coefficient B.

Perioperative Variables USC B 95% CI p
EBL
              COVID-19+ 78.607 (9.328, 147.887) 0.027
              Age -1.344 (-3.713, 1.025) 0.263
              Female Sex -65.317 (-123.139, 7.495) 0.065
              BMI -2.137 (-6.476, 2.203) 0.331
              Diabetes -49.504 (-106.745, 7.736) 0.089
              ASA Perioperative Blood Thinner -72.002 (-141.647, 2.173) 0.076
              INR 0.346 (-108.647, 109.338) 0.995
              Hg -6.301 (-22.296, 9.695) 0.437
Length of Stay
             COVID-19+ Cutoff 1 Year -1.703 (-3.167, -0.240) 0.026
             Age 0.034 (-0.018, 0.086) 0.177
             Female Sex -0.041 (-1.514, 1.433) 0.953
             BMI 0.052 (-0.050, 0.155) 0.290
             Diabetes 0.171 (-1.439, 1.781) 0.822
             ASA Perioperative Blood Thinner -1.333 (-3.355, 0.689) 0.178
             INR -1.910 (-13.301, 9.480) 0.723
             Hg -0.316 (-0.878, 0.246) 0.246
Table
5: Multivariate Linear Regression for COVID-19 Positivity and Estimated Blood Loss

In a multivariate model, COVID-19 positivity was associated with much greater EBL while female sex and ASA use were preoperatively associated with decreased EBL. A COVID-19+ cut-off of 1 year ago was associated with significantly shorter LOS.

EBL, estimated blood loss; BMI, body mass index; ASA, aspirin; INR, international normalized ratio; Hg, hemoglobin; USC B, unstandardized coefficient B.

Discussion

As the number of TJA performed increases to pre-pandemic rates nationwide, the population of asymptomatic prior C+ patients receiving TJA will increase. Although prior studies have demonstrated higher rates of cardiopulmonary complications, thromboembolic disease, renal injury, and urinary tract infections in postoperative COVID+ patients one month from joint arthroplasty, our study focuses on whether a preoperative resolved asymptomatic COVID+ diagnosis increases the risks for complications and outcomes [6]. Preoperative risk stratification for elective TJA is an important component of perioperative planning and medical optimization in an effort to reduce healthcare costs and decrease preventable complications [11]. As institutions implement COVID testing protocols to prevent the active perioperative spread of COVID in TJA, it is still unknown whether asymptomatic patients have an increased hypercoagulable inflammatory state that may perhaps warrant a prolonged prophylactic course of antibiotics or chemical DVT prophylaxis not routinely prescribed [12]. In this study, we demonstrate preliminary results of a prior COVID+ diagnosis having no increased rates of respiratory, infectious, cardiac, and thromboembolic complications up to six months after elective TJA with the standard postoperative protocol.

While other studies focus on the effects of a new COVID diagnosis during the perioperative period, our study is the first to our knowledge to examine the effects of a prior asymptomatic PCR COVID+ diagnosis > at least 3 months prior to the surgical date. Our average COVID+ diagnosis of ~250 days prior to surgery is relevant for healthcare providers stratifying a rising number of asymptomatic COVID+ elderly patients who have never undergone stresses of surgery post COVID. There are conflicting studies reporting on the prolonged duration of increased DVT, cardiac abnormalities, and PE rates in COVID patients after inoculation, and our study aims to demonstrate asymptomatic patients, >6 months since the last positive PCR test, have no increased risks of UTI, PJI, PE, DVT, and cardiac arrhythmias after joint arthroplasty [13]. Many of our patients had delayed procedures due to positive testing, and they are at increased risk for thromboembolism due to worsened arthritis and reduced mobility during the self-isolation period [14]. Despite theories on increased coagulopathy in prior positive patients, our findings of no increased risks for thromboembolic disease suggest more aggressive prophylactic anticoagulation regimens may not be necessary and otherwise increase the risk for hematoma formation [6,15]. While many of our patients were limited in formal therapy sessions due to pandemic restrictions, our patients were given supplemental standardized home therapy programs to encourage active recovery and mobility.

Although effects of prior COVID diagnosis on respiratory complications have been seen in prior literature, there are no studies correlating PCR COVID diagnosis to either increased MRSA nares colonization or supplemental oxygen requirements in arthroplasty patients. MRSA nares colonization is a known risk factor for periprosthetic joint infections, and prior reports indicate increased MRSA colonization during the COVID pandemic [16]. Our study indicates prior PCR COVID diagnosis had no increased risk for MRSA colonization despite theories on the decreased nasal immune response to respiratory co-pathogens after COVID infection [17]. Our overall low MRSA nares rate may reflect institutionalized trends of mask-wearing, physical distancing, reducing crowds, and hand hygiene used to prevent the spread of respiratory infections. In fact, our COVID patients had no increased leukocytosis or risk for overall UTI, pneumonia, or PJI complications. Low infection rates suggest no overall compromise to the immune function combined with the possible efficacy of current social distancing trends. Our C+ patients not only had no increased rates of MRSA nares colonization and postoperative infections, but they had no increased rates of postoperative oxygen supplementation requirements during their inpatient stay and at physical therapy sessions. Preventing atelectasis is an important postoperative goal to reduce further postoperative hypoxemia that may lead to arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, and cognitive dysfunction [18]. Prior COVID+ PCR had no effects on post ambulatory breathing oxygenation and no increased rates of nasal cannula use that would indicate reduced respiratory function.

While comorbidities between groups were similar, this study had a higher percentage of males who were COVID+ and subsequently preoperative Hb was higher in the C+ group due to the greater percentages of males [19]. C+ was a significant risk factor for increased EBL intraoperative, which may reflect C+ coagulopathy and loss of antithrombotic mechanisms from imbalances between coagulation and inflammation [12]. While there were no increased postoperative hematomas, INR levels, or postoperative blood transfusions seen in the C+ group, surgeons should strive to obtain meticulous hemostasis and be aware that C+ may increase surgical blood loss. Although discharge destination and LOS were similar between C+ and C-, hospital LOS was inversely related to the number of days from C+ diagnosis to surgical date. COVID-19 positivity >6 months or >1 year away from surgery significantly decreased overall LOS, which may suggest faster recovery and less need for inpatient monitoring. It is possible that our C+ patients with increased EBL combined with inflammatory post-surgical stresses experienced greater physiologic demand postoperatively that required longer inpatient recovery [20]. The findings from this study have important insight for future arthroplasty centers as the surgical community begins to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic, which has caused widespread and numerous delays in surgical care.

There are several limitations to this study. Despite our preliminary findings, suggesting that elective joint replacement surgery is safe in patients with a history of COVID-19, the study is not well powered to detect differences in in-hospital complications, especially for rarer complications such as pulmonary emboli. Additionally, more research is needed in larger samples to confirm the robustness of this finding, as well as to investigate longer-term outcomes. Our cohort of C+ patients may not represent the true spectrum of the disease of all prior C+ patients as our population undergoing elective joint replacement were medically cleared and self-selected to undergo TJA. It is possible that our C+ patients were on the healthier side of the COVID spectrum as sicker patients are more likely to not be medically optimized for elective surgery and be at higher risk of perioperative complications. Since a C+ diagnosis is not randomized and our findings reflect a retrospective review, our results must be viewed as associations and a larger sample size is needed to detect the possible variability in outcomes associated with the various increasing strains of COVID.

Conclusions

Although a prior COVID+ diagnosis had increased intraoperative blood loss, there were no significant differences in respiratory, infectious, cardiac, and thromboembolic complications up to six months after elective TJA. Increased time from C+ diagnosis to surgical date predicted less EBL and shorter LOS, which may reflect a possible improved recovery in C- compared to C+ patients. This study suggests that asymptomatic C+ patients receiving elective TJA do not require more aggressive prophylactic anticoagulation or antibiotic regimens to prevent VTE or perioperative infections. As institutions around the nation resume pre-COVID rates of arthroplasty surgeries, the effect of prior diagnosis of COVID should be further investigated across a larger sample size to determine the true effect of a prior diagnosis on overall outcomes.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: joint replacement, ORTHO NEWS

A robotic assistant for joint replacement surgery

by

Are you one of the millions of silent sufferers living with chronic pain caused by arthritis or an injury to the hip or knee?

While conservative treatment options are the first line of treatment, some patients with severe disease may require hip or knee replacement surgery.

While we’re more used to human surgeons wielding the scalpel, nowadays, such surgery can be done with the help of robotic technology.

In Malaysia, over 300 patients have undergone robotic arm- assisted knee or hip replacement surgery since its introduction here in recent years.

Consultant orthopaedic, joint and arthroplasty surgeon Dr Chua Hwa Sen shares that the popularity of robotic arm-assisted knee and hip replacement surgeries is growing due to its ability to provide each patient with a surgical experience that is specifically tailored to the individual’s needs and anatomy.

With the new technology, he says surgeons are able to facilitate more accurate placement of implants, while being minimally invasive in cutting the patient.

This allows patients to experience less post-operative pain and recover faster.

He explains: “Treatment begins with CT-based 3D modelling to help surgeons view in detail each patient’s diseased anatomy prior to surgery to formulate a personalised surgical plan.

“Given that every joint is different – even more so for diseased joints, as the degree of severity varies greatly in different patients – the robot (along with pre-operative CT scans and 3D reconstruction) greatly helps surgeons plan accurately for each patient.

“The robot intraoperatively helps surgeons to seek the most ideal position and size of new joints for the patients, as well as accurately resect the bones and implant the new joints.”

Interest among the surgical community in this procedure is also increasing, with more and more surgeons showing interest in being trained for these procedures.

They merely assist

Dr Chua also assures that the robot is not doing the entire surgery and is merely assisting with the operation.

“People often think that surgeons sit back and relax when the surgery is being conducted by the robot.

“That is not true.

“The robot is a semi-active robot. Hence, the procedure is called robotic arm-assisted joint replacement.

“The surgeon is there every step of the way to expose the joints, release soft tissues, feed live movement of the joints to the robots intraoperatively to have wider combinations of data.”

He explains that the robot’s function during surgery is to enable surgeons to be precise in determining the best placement of implants within the joint.

The robot can accurately feed back data that is impossible to be detected with the naked eyes, he says, adding that it can adjust bone cuts and the degree of joint rotation as precisely as 0.1mm and 0.5 degrees respectively.

“Accuracy makes the surgery less invasive and enables us to sacrifice less healthy bone and tissues.

“‘The more we see, the more you keep’ is the key message of CT- based 3D modelling robotic arm-assisted joint replacement to our patients.”

Dr Chua notes that the robot’s accuracy reduces post-operative pain greatly, reduces the need for physical therapy, helps patients accept new joints with less effort, achieves a much better outcome, and potentially increases the longevity of the new implants.

Urging the public to be more open to technological advancements, he says the rise of robotics and artificial intelligence in healthcare is beneficial to society and should be embraced.

“Instead of being wary of it, let it assist us and improve our quality of life.”

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: joint replacement, ORTHO NEWS

Useful Health Tips for People With Chronic Hip Issues

by

Do you suffer from chronic hip issues? If so, you know how frustrating and debilitating this problem can be. There are many things that you can do to help manage your condition and improve your quality of life. This blog post will discuss some useful health tips for people with chronic hip issues. It will also provide a list of resources that can help you find additional information and support.

1. Hip replacement surgery

If you are suffering from chronic hip pain, you may be considering hip replacement surgery. This is a major operation and should not be undertaken lightly. However, it can be an effective treatment for many people with hip problems. If you are considering this option, be sure to discuss it with your doctor and get all the information you can about the risks and benefits. When you undergo the patient journey for hip replacement surgery, you will first meet with your doctor to discuss the procedure. They will then complete a pre-operative assessment to make sure that you are a good candidate for surgery. Once you have been cleared for surgery, you will be scheduled for the procedure.

2. Physical therapy

Another option that you may want to consider is physical therapy. This can be an effective treatment for many people with hip problems. Physical therapy can help to improve range of motion, flexibility, and strength. It can also help to reduce pain and inflammation. If you are considering this option, be sure to discuss it with your doctor. They will be able to refer you to a physical therapist who can help you develop a treatment plan that is right for you.

Physical therapy usually begins with a few sessions of evaluation and education. During these sessions, your therapist will assess your condition and develop a treatment plan. They will also teach you some exercises that you can do at home to help improve your condition.

3. Pain medication

Another option that you may want to consider is pain medication. There are many different types of pain medications available, and your doctor will be able to prescribe the one that is right for you. Pain medication can help to reduce pain and inflammation. It can also help to improve the range of motion and function. If you are considering this option, be sure to discuss it with your doctor. They will be able to determine if this is the best treatment for you. Sometimes, pain medication is used in combination with other treatments, such as physical therapy.

4. Alternative treatments

There are also many alternative treatments that you may want to consider. These include acupuncture, chiropractic care, and massage therapy. These treatments can help to reduce pain and improve function. If you are considering any of these options, be sure to discuss them with your doctor. They will be able to determine if this is the best treatment for you. While these treatments can be effective, it is important to remember that they should not be used as a replacement for medical care.

5. Light exercise

Next, one of the best things that you can do for your chronic hip issues is to stay active. Light exercise can help to improve range of motion, flexibility, and strength. It can also help to reduce pain and inflammation. If you are not sure how to get started, there are many resources available that can help you. The important thing is to find an activity that you enjoy and stick with it. You can do some research online or talk to your doctor about what options are available. Also, be sure to check with your insurance company to see if they cover any of the costs associated with these activities.

6. Lose weight

Another thing that you can do to improve your chronic hip pain is to lose weight. If you are overweight, it can put extra pressure on your hips and joints. This can lead to pain and inflammation. Losing even a few pounds can make a big difference. If you are not sure how to get started, there are many resources available that can help you. You can talk to your doctor about a weight loss plan that is right for you. They may also be able to refer you to a dietitian or nutritionist who can help you develop a healthy eating plan.

These are just a few of the many health tips that can be useful for people with chronic hip issues. If you are suffering from this condition, be sure to talk to your doctor about all of the treatment options that are available to you. With the right treatment plan, you can improve your quality of life and manage your condition effectively. So, don’t hesitate to get the help you need. Good luck!

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: HIP, hip surgery, ORTHO NEWS

Am I Too Old to Get My Knee or Hip Replaced? What to Consider at Age 70, 80 and Up

by

Sometimes, age really is just a number — and not even the most important one. Take joint replacement surgery. If you’ve been wondering if you’re too old to get your knee or hip replaced, you’re probably asking the wrong question.

“We’re more concerned about a patient’s health over their chronological age,” says Mark Shekhman, MD, an orthopedic surgeon at the Bone & Joint Institute at Hartford Hospital. “There is no real limit to the age.”

Considering a joint replacement in your 70s or 80s? Join the club.

Dr. Shekhman has reassured plenty of 70- and 80-year-old patients: Not only are they not too old for a joint replacement — they’re in the most common age group.

“Patients in their 70s and 80s are old enough to have worn out their joints, but usually healthy enough to go through surgery,” says Dr. Shekhman.

Even patients in their 90s can be candidates.

Many joint replacement patients in their 90s had passed on the procedure earlier in life, believing they were too old. But after years of severe pain and even disability, they find themselves rethinking their decision.

“Finally they say, ‘I can’t live like this anymore,’” says Dr. Shekhman. “In this case, I recommend that they have a family meeting to discuss the somewhat increased risks given their age. If all family members agree that the benefits outweigh the risks, then we go ahead with the medical screening process.”

Thanks to medical advances, joint replacements are safer at every age.

Does this all sound too good to be true?

Twenty years ago, maybe. But today, we have the benefit of less invasive techniques and gentler anesthesia methods — which make joint replacements safer than ever.

“With the advancement of medical technology, the surgery is a less physiologically stressful experience for the body than it once was. We’re not replacing major organ systems like the heart or liver,” says Dr. Shekhman. “The risks today are quite low for all age groups.”

The real question: Are you healthy enough to get your hip or knee replaced?

At every age, deciding whether to have an elective procedure comes down to whether you’re healthy enough — even for a relatively low-risk procedure like a joint replacement.

This is where a thorough medical screening process comes in.

“We wouldn’t jump out of a plane without a parachute,” says Dr. Shekhman. “And we wouldn’t proceed with surgery without a thorough screening process to make sure a patient is ready and safe.”

Age is certainly a factor, but it’s far from the only one.

For example, a 60-year-old with a history of smoking, diabetes, obesity and heart disease might have too many health risks to qualify for an elective joint replacement. Meanwhile, a comparatively active and healthy 90-year-old could get the green light.

The takeaway: You’re never too old to ask about a knee or hip replacement.

These surgeries often transform quality of life: They can relieve severe pain from arthritis and other conditions, and return you to activities that mean the most to you. Plus, the benefits are practically immediate.

“The patient can walk on the replaced joint the same day, fully weight-bearing, within a few hours after the operation,” says Dr. Shekhman.

So if you’ve been considering a knee or hip replacement, it’s worth a conversation with your doctor — even if you’re getting up there in years.

Haven’t you heard? Eighty is the new sixty.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: ORTHO NEWS, ortho news - Google

Learn More About Total Hip Arthroplasty and the Function of Robotics in THA

by

When robotic THA was first used in the 1990s, there were doubts as to whether the new technology would improve the results for patients having THA. (Image: Shutterstock)

The use of robotics in THA is the newest trending topic for the third decade of this millennium. THA and all associated topics are discussed here by Dr. Samarth Arya, Consultant Orthopaedics, Joint Replacement & Robotic Surgery, Sparsh Hospital, Bengaluru

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is deemed to be one of the most successful surgical procedures available throughout healthcare. The modern THA was pioneered by Sir John Charnley, a British based surgeon at Wrightington Hospital, UK in the early 1960’s. Ever since, there has been focus in different areas of THA every decade for improving the outcomes. The new hot topic for the third decade of this millennium is use of robotics in THA. Robotic THA was first performed in 1990’s and there were concerns if the new technology will improve the outcomes in patients undergoing THA.

Apart from patient factors, the success of THA largely depends on surgeon factors. One of the most important surgeon factors affecting the success of this procedure is positioning and placement of implants. According to the data from National Joint Registry UK, dislocation is the most common cause for revision of hip surgery.

Improper placement of the components will most commonly lead to hip dislocation. Even in experienced hands with high surgical volume, there is a range of component positioning. Improper component positioning can also result in impingement of the hip and accelerated wear of implants, periprosthetic fracture which will all require revision hip surgery. Robotic assistance in THA has demonstrated perfect component positioning and reproducibility in every patient with diverse anatomy and pathology 100% of the time.

Another consideration of robotic assisted THA is maintaining stability with preservation of as much acetabular and femoral bone stock as possible. If the incidence of revision hip surgery arises in these patients in the future, increased preservation of bone stock in the primary surgery will make the revision surgery less complex.

Incorrect implant placement will also result in leg length discrepancy which will result in patient dissatisfaction and inferior outcomes. However, in robotic assisted THA, there is maintenance and improvement of leg length equality.

Robotic assistance in THA improves the accuracy of implant placement in THA as it is designed for each patient’s individual anatomy. This tool could also be used to provide training opportunities for junior surgeons in a controlled environment.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: HIP, hip surgery, ORTHO NEWS

Joint replacement: Myths and facts related to knee replacement surgery

by

Joint Replacement Surgery involves replacing the worn out or damaged joint surfaces with artificial joints called prosthesis where knee, hip and shoulder joints are commonly replaced joints. Joint replacement surgeries are beneficial in relieving pain and restoring your lost mobility.

In total knee replacement surgery, all the three compartments (medial, lateral, patellofemoral) are replaced whereas in partial knee replacement surgery only the damaged compartment is replaced. Even though knee replacement surgery has good outcomes, there are some misconceptions regarding it.

In an interview with HT Lifestyle, Dr Anup Khatri, Senior Consultant- Orthopaedics at Global Hospital in Mumbai’s Parel, debunked some of these myths and revealed facts –

1. Myth: Bending of knee, stair climbing, sitting cross-legged or sitting on floor is not possible after knee replacement surgery.

Fact: Most prosthesis used nowadays (HIGH FLEXION type) allow the same range of movement as normal knee joint. It allows patients to bend knees, stair climbing, and sitting cross-legged as well. It depends mainly on the quality of surgery done and postoperative rehabilitation.

2. Myth: After surgery, a few weeks of bed rest is needed and it takes months to recover.

Fact: In fact, patients are able to walk on the same day of surgery and most people get back to their routine activities within few weeks of surgery.

3. Myth: The metal in artificial knee implants may induce allergic reactions in the body.

Fact: The metals used are inert and do not react with body tissues. Also there are implants with coating of titanium alloy popularly known as gold knee, which are proven to be non-allergic and long lasting.

4. Myth: It is not possible to undergo surgery after the age of 65 years.

Fact: Age is not a limiting factor for the surgery. As Osteoarthritis is age related wear & tear of cartilage, one can undergo knee replacement successfully even after 65 years of age.

5. Myth: The success rate of surgery is very low.

Fact: Research shows that knee replacement surgery has 95% success rates in most patients. After surgery, people are able to perform their daily activities comfortably and without pain.

6. Myth: After surgery lifelong physiotherapy is needed and recovery is very slow.

Fact: Long term physiotherapy is not needed. The exercises taught while in hospital can be done at home. After joint replacement surgery, patients’ recovery has been faster and patients can be discharged from hospital in 3 days due to the advanced minimally invasive surgical techniques followed. Preconditioning also helps, wherein preoperatively patients’ nutritional status and muscle strengths are optimised and same are followed after surgery.

However, like any other surgery, there are some benefits and risks for this surgery too. It is always better to clarify any misconceptions by consulting your doctor.

Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: KNEE, Knee Surgery, ORTHO NEWS

Surgery for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

by

Most kids with juvenile idiopathic arthritis never need surgery, but if your child does, here’s what you can expect.

Some 300,000 children ages 16 or younger have juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), an umbrella term for various health conditions that can cause joint pain, swelling, stiffness, and loss of motion. Like other forms of arthritis, JIA starts when a child’s immune system becomes overactive, triggering an inflammatory response.

It’s not uncommon for JIA to be a long-term health condition, but there are many effective medications that can treat your child’s arthritis. Thanks to these drugs, inflammation is often brought under control before it reaches the point of causing joint damage. That means kids diagnosed with JIA today are much less likely to need surgery than in generations past.

Medication, along with active treatment tools like exercise and assistive devices such as splints, mean that your child’s joint pain can often be kept to a minimum.

Still, though considered a last resort, surgery may sometimes benefit some of the most severe cases of JIA. This could be either because medication is unable to stop the progression of joint damage, or your child was not diagnosed with JIA until after joint damage had already occurred. In these cases, surgery may offer pain relief with JIA and could also restore function to damaged joints.

Who Needs Surgery for JIA?

Step one, say experts, is to try and avoid invasive procedures for JIA kids. “We try to treat children aggressively with medication so we can preserve their joints and avoid surgery,” says Farzana Nuruzzaman, M.D., a pediatric rheumatologist at Stony Brook Children’s Hospital and clinical assistant professor at the Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University in Stony Brook, NY. “Unfortunately, in some cases the arthritis has caused so much damage that certain types of surgery are needed.” In those cases, if your child is not improving on medication and her quality of life is suffering, surgery may be an option.

If your child’s jaw is affected by arthritis pain, for instance, surgery might be recommended, says Beth Susan Gottlieb, M.D., chief of the division of pediatric rheumatology at Northwell Health in New Hyde Park, NY. “Arthritis in the jaw can slow down the growth of the lower jaw, which causes a smaller jaw,” Dr. Gottlieb explains. “Surgery can improve the appearance of the face and make the joint healthier.”

Types of JIA Surgery

If your child is a candidate for JIA surgery, it helps to know what to expect. The surgical procedures that may be recommended include:

Osteotomy

In an osteotomy, explains Dr. Nuruzzaman, a bone is cut and repositioned to fix a bone deformity. Then the bone is reset into a better position. An osteotomy could be performed on the foot, hip, knee, or the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in the jaw. Jaw surgery can not only make eating and chewing easier but can improve a child’s facial structure and self-confidence. This procedure is considered low-risk and safer than a total knee or hip replacement, according to the American College of Rheumatology.

Joint Fusion (Arthrodesis)

In a joint fusion, “the surgeon removes the damaged cartilage from the ends of two bones that form a joint and then holds [the bones] in place with a pin or a rod,” Dr. Nuruzzaman explains. Over time, the two bones fuse to form a single unit, much as a broken bone fuses when it heals. While arthrodesis can stabilize a joint and help it bear weight better, the fusion of these bones will result in the loss of some mobility. It’s usually performed on joints in the foot and ankle, hand and wrist, or spine, per the Arthritis Foundation.

Synovectomy

The synovium is a thin membrane that lines the joint capsule, but when JIA causes chronic inflammation of this lining, it grows much thicker and can affect the structure and function of the joint. In this procedure, explains Dr. Nuruzzaman, the surgeon removes inflamed synovial lining that develops from chronic inflammation.A synovectomy alsocan be done arthroscopically, says Daniel Lovell, M.D., professor of pediatrics at the University of Cincinnati School of Medicine at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. “The surgeon can go in using a scope and can also do an injection of steroids at the same time, which can reduce pain,” he says.

Epiphysiodesis

This procedure can help correct a difference in leg lengths, Dr. Nuruzzaman explains. (Leg-length discrepancy is a common symptom of JIA, per the American Academy of Orthopeadic Surgeons). Epiphysiodesis is usually is for children whose anticipated leg-length discrepancy is nearly an inch and who have a year or two of growth remaining. In a temporary epiphysiodesis, metal plates may be used to temporarily halt bone growth in the longer leg. With a permanent epiphysiodesis, part of the growth plate is removed.

“The growth plate of the longer leg is removed or replaced with a metal plate so the longer leg growth stops,” Dr. Nuruzzaman says. In addition, Dr. Lovell explains, if a leg has excessive angulation due to arthritis causing one side of the knee to grow faster, then a temporary epiphysiodesis may be used to straighten the leg by limiting the growth on the faster growing side of the knee joint.

Total Joint Replacement (Arthroplasty)

An arthroplasty “is when the damaged joint is removed and replaced with an artificial joint,” Dr. Nuruzzaman says. Considered a last-ditch option for children, it is usually reserved for a joint that is so damaged, painful, and stiff that it interferes with a child’s quality of life and ability to function. The hip is the joint that is most commonly replaced, followed by the knee. “Total joint replacement is usually done in later adolescence or young adulthood,” says Dr. Lovell.

The Pros and Cons of Surgery for JIA

All surgeries have a potential risk, and the surgeon should carefully explain both risks and benefits. And keep in mind: surgery is generally not a cure. “Surgeries do not protect against the progression of the underlying inflammatory disorder,” Dr. Nuruzzaman says.

Moreover, some surgeries may need to be repeated. For instance, performing TMJ surgery before facial growth is complete (15 years for girls and 17 to 18 years for boys) may mean that repeat operations may be necessary.

One con of joint fusion is that after the surgery, your child will not be able to bend the joint. And sometimes, the bone does not fuse, the wound may not properly heal, or arthritis develops in nearby joints due to stress from the fusion. It is important that you and your child understand both the benefits and risks of joint fusion.

Another consideration: Artificial joints cannot grow like natural joints so if the joint is replaced before growth is complete, then the growth in the area of the replaced joint will stop. In addition, an artificial joint does not last forever. For this reason, repeat surgeries are typically needed and can be more challenging to perform.

The main benefit of surgery for JIA is that for many children with juvenile arthritis, surgery can offer pain relief and improve their quality of life.

What You Can Expect After Surgery

Recuperation from surgery for JIA varies depending on the surgery, the joint, your child’s overall health, and more. Full recovery from a joint fusion may take months. After an epiphysiodesis, the recovery is brief and has few complications, per the Arthritis Foundation. One possible complication is that the metal plates could loosen, or a leg that is corrected temporarily could revert to its previous length.

Osteotomy procedures are generally low risk, but recovery can be rough: The Arthritis Foundation notes that for a few months after the procedure, kids have to wear elastic bands to support the jaw. They may also need to use a palatal splint and eat a soft diet.

After a synovectomy, symptoms like pain and swelling should get better. Usually, though, the synovium will grow back over time if there is not control of the inflammation in the joint with the medicines used to treat the arthritis, Dr. Lovell says. The synovectomy can be repeated if this happens.

Outlook for Children with JIA

The good news is that JIA is treatable, most children who have it can expect to live normal lives, and very few will need joint surgery, Dr. Lovell says. Some children will see their JIA go into remission.

And surgery can be a good option for some children with JIA. “We try to avoid surgery,” says Dr. Nuruzzaman. “But in some cases, it can improve a child’s quality of life.”

Rosemary Black

Meet Our Writer

Rosemary Black

Rosemary, the mom of seven, was food editor at the New York Daily News for many years and currently writes on health, food, and parenting for various magazines and websites. She is the co-author of six cookbooks, most

###[ad_2]
Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: joint replacement, ORTHO NEWS

Metformin Treatment in T2D Patients May Reduce Risk for Joint Replacement: Population-based Study

by

[ad_1]

Persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are treated with metformin may be at significantly reduced risk for total joint replacement (hip, knee) according to research from China published online January 19, 2023, in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

The population-based matched cohort study of more than 40 000 participants found the risk of total knee replacement (TKR) or total hip replacement (THR) was reduced by 30% in participants who received metformin compared to those who did not.

Total joint replacement is often required in older adults with osteoarthritis (OA) primarily because there are no treatments available to prevent or reverse the chronic progressive joint disease, the authors write. They point to trends in the US where the demand for both TKR and THR is expected to reach 3.5 million by 2030 when a projected 572 000 surgeries will be required annually.

The investigators, led by Changhai Ding, MD, PhD, professor and director, Clinical Research and Orthopedic Centres, Zhujiang Hospital at Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, also point out that OA is common in those with T2D. In fact, T2D is a known OA risk factor, independent of body mass index and there is evidence that insulin resistance may hasten the development of OA. Interestingly, metformin, in addition to being the first line antihyperglycemic agent for T2D around the world, also has been associated with reducing risk of cardiovascular and inflammatory disease and shown to have chondroprotective effects. The authors cite evidence that intra-articular metformin administered shortly after joint injury has delayed OA development in animal models, as well.


In the US…the demand for both TKR and THR is expected to reach 3.5 million by 2030 when a projected 572 000 surgeries will be required annually.


Despite some evidence of a T2D-OA association, however, Ding et al say that, overall, studies looking at the potential correlation are “uncommon and inconclusive.”

To add to and help clarify existing findings, Ding et al tapped the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, selecting adults aged ≥45 years who were diagnosed with T2D between 2000 and 2012. The investigators then identified those treated with metformin, defining a metformin user as anyone who had initiated the drug within 180 days before or after a diagnosis of T2D. Researchers matched metformin users by age, sex, and time of diagnosis with nonusers in the database. They conducted separate analyses using prescription time-distribution matching (PTDM) and propensity-score matching (PSM) to balance potential confounding variables.

The primary outcomes were TKR or THR after the index date (3 months after the first metformin prescription). The authors point out that because all cases were peer-reviewed before reimbursement was approved, the accuracy of the data on TKR and THR was high.

FINDINGS

The final study cohort numbered 40 694 participants with 20 347 each in the metformin user and nonuser groups. Mean age was 63 years 49.8% were women. A total of 837 patients underwent TKR and 148 underwent THR in the PTDM cohorts and an average of 90% of replacements were related to OA (97.5% for TKR, 50.7% for THR).

When Ding and colleagues compared participants who did not use metformin with those who did, use of metformin was associated with a lower cumulative incidence probability of TKR, THR or either joint replacement. The TKR incidence in the PTDM cohort was 2.96 vs 4.15 per 10 000 person-months for metformin users and nonusers respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.84). For THR in this cohort incidence was 0.44 vs 0.83 per 10 000 person-months for users and nonusers respectively, with an adjusted HR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.41-0.92).

In the PSM cohort, when researchers compared metformin users with those who did not use the drug, the crude HR of total joint replacement was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61–0.87), and the adjusted HR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.62–0.89). They report a significant reduction in risk for TKR in metformin users compared to nonusers (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.92) and a similar but not significant reduction for THR (aHR 0.71, 95% CI 0.44-1.13) in the PMS cohort. Propensity-score matching analyses (10 163 participants not treated with metformin v. 10 163 treated with metformin) and sensitivity analyses using inverse probability of treatment weighting and competing risk regression showed similar results.

Diabetes and metabolic syndrome have both been linked to OA in the past, the investigators write. They point out also that although the biological mechanisms linking metformin with protection against OA remain unclear, the reduction in need for total joint replacement in T2D patients may be explained by metformin’s anti-inflammatory properties, its ability to sustain adenosine 5′-monophosphate–activated protein kinase activity in chondrocytes and to regulate metabolism.

“Given our findings and those of a previous observational study, a randomized trial of the efficacy of metformin in patients with OA is indicated. Metformin has been studied in patients without diabetes mellitus and was found to be safe,” they conclude.


Reference: Zhu Z, Huang J-Y, Ruan G, et al. Metformin use and associated risk of total joint replacement in patients with type 2 diabetes: a population-based matched cohort study. CMAJ. 2022;194:E1672-84. doi:10.1503/cmaj.220952


###[ad_2]
Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: ORTHO NEWS, ortho news - Google

Robotics Procedure Helping People Recover From Joint Replacement Surgery

by

Tulsa Bone and Joint’s Union Pines Surgery Center is now the first ambulatory surgery center in Oklahoma to have the Mako SmartRobotics technology.

With the Mako SmartRobotics system, surgeons can better see how surgeries like a knee replacement will impact the entire body.

“What the Mako allows us to do, the way I explain it to my patients, is it allows us to know the consequences of the bony cuts we’re going to make, before we actually make them,” said Dr. Scott Reid, an Orthopedic Surgeon.

This data can help surgeons decide the best course of action for each patient, because everyone does not react the same way.

This is especially helpful in situations where the result can be hard to predict.

“The problem with soft tissue releases is that they’re not very predictable,” said Reid. “You may think when you’re in the operating room that you’ve balanced the knee really well, ultimately that may not actually be the case.”

Finding potential problems earlier, can change the recovery process, and the lives, of patients.

“One outlier, if we have one patient out of 100 that has a poor outcome because we didn’t get the implants in exactly the way they needed to be, that’s a big burden to that patient and we want to try to eliminate those as much as possible,” said Reid. “But there’s a big cost to the system.”

Reid says this technology has been in hospitals for nearly a decade, but using the Mako at Tulsa Bone and Joint’s surgery center can benefit more patients.

“Now, I think we’ve got every insurance contract that we have, to include Medicare and all the other subsidiaries of Medicare, we have the technology available to them now,” said Reid.

He’s excited about the future of this technology and the number of people it can help in the future.

“If we can use this technology to provide a more consistent outcome to our patients, ultimately that’s what we’re looking for,” said Reid.

The first two knee replacements using this surgery were performed successfully last Thursday.


###[ad_2]
Originally Appeared Here

Filed Under: joint replacement, ORTHO NEWS

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

ORTHO NEWS

Putting Your Best Foot Forward for Joint Surgery Success | Health

Putting Your Best Foot Forward for Joint Surgery Success

Use of Antibiotic Lavage in Total Knee Replacement to Prevent Postoperative Infection

Use of Antibiotic Lavage in Total Knee Replacement to Prevent Postoperative Infection

Tips to care for an elderly after hip replacement surgery

Tips to care for an elderly person after hip replacement surgery

Exactech Total Knee Failure Resulted in Revision Surgery, Lawsuit Alleges

Exactech Total Knee Failure Resulted in Revision Surgery, Lawsuit Alleges

AAOS Updates Clinical Practice Guideline for Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

AAOS Updates Clinical Practice Guideline for Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Can Metformin Lower Need for Joint Replacement in Diabetes?

Can Metformin Lower Need for Joint Replacement in Diabetes?

Patients with late-stage knee OA incur high costs for nonoperative treatments before total knee arthroplasty

Patients with late-stage knee OA incur high costs for nonoperative treatments before total knee arthroplasty

A Road to Recovery After Knee Surgery: 6 Tips to Follow

A Road to Recovery After Knee Surgery: 6 Tips to Follow

New laser surface modification process with silver provides antimicrobial defense to titanium orthopedic devices

New laser surface modification process with silver provides antimicrobial defense to titanium orthopedic devices

Novel Imaging Technique Reveals Excellent Biologic Fixation in Cementless Knee Replacement

Novel Imaging Technique Reveals Excellent Biologic Fixation in Cementless Knee Replacement

Copyright 2014 All Rights Reserved · DISCLAIMER: Nothing here constitutes legal, medical, or other advice; all content relates to an individual perspective only. A professional relationship with a physician, or with a lawyer is built over time, with mutual investment, trust, and respect. This site is not a substitute for that.
~ THIS DOMAIN IS FOR SALE ~

Privacy Policy